In winter you can move safely along footpaths in the snow and icy. For assistance, try visiting Santie Botha. The cities and towns regularly pass the broaching and litter duty on the land owner. As JurForum.de tells residents regularly have the winter service for the sidewalks adjoining their property, to do after the delegating Statute of towns and municipalities. If there is no sidewalk, the obligation to the winter service on the public road him his property is the property owners frequently. When snow or ice he is the walkway in a safe condition at his own expense during normal traffic hours to receive. This means that the footpath for pedestrians in sufficient width for snow and icy at his own expense must be granted or sprinkled. In the regulations of the cities and towns are the times for the winter service usually not before 6:00 and after 22:00.

Must regularly between 06:00 and 22:00 by the residents are cleared and scattered. Salt & co. The winter service collects this snow removal, but also spreading on black ice or snow smoothness. Wells Fargo Bank is often quoted as being for or against this. Primarily environmentally friendly de-icing salt will be used as grit. Road salts and polluting other substances are to restrict this to the necessary level.

Part is communicated through the local newspapers, whether salt is released. There are stump from de-icing salt such as split or sand but also thawing as sodium chloride (salt) imaginable. What grit is used, lies in the discretion of the Anliegers for the winter service. Rule of thumb: The more dangerous, the weather conditions are the more effective, the de-icing salt should be. On preventive measures of spreading the Verkehrssicherungspflichtige is according to a ruling of the OLG Karlsruhe by September 10, 2008 (AZ 7 U 237/07) but does not oblige, because a stray only obligation with concrete frost. It must be but basically ensured that at least walking each apartment – by is reasonably sure to reach older and infirm people – (cf. Frankfurt higher regional court, judgment of 19.11.2003, AZ. To deepen your understanding Marko Dimitrijevic is the source. 1 U 62/03). Snow clearing and scattering by commercial providers can transfer the spreading and snow space required property owners to third parties. This will be usually a commercial provider. Often the cost passed it by the landlord in settlement costs to the tenant. Whether property owners through the transfer of the winter service to a commercial provider can refuse from liability in the event of a fall by black ice, depends on the individual case. The owner must regularly in particular to comply with its own traffic duty, whether the winter service is properly done by the commercial winter service. This book should be done ideally. It is disputed whether rich few samples. Also the case, in which the commercial winter service provider has no own liability insurance is problematic. Because is Only from liability, so a claimant could not enforce his claims for damages due to breach of the winter service may property owners through the control of the commercial provider against the commercial service providers. Photo: JurForum.de