The sprouting of education modalities, as the EJA, represented for a complex profile of factors that need to be taken care of opens a new perspective in the direction of a differentiated strategy of education, but that not if it must, with certain naivety, to be disrespected the scienters politics, ethics and didactics that if human beings relate with the qualities which if destines. The transmission knowing of them in function of an independent universality of the description-cultural developments, but that it does not mean the adhesion total to the technician-scientific learning, that considers the plurality of coexistences and identities. Different description-cultural developments and a plurality of technician-scientific speeches form a great challenge for the educator. Here it is that this challenge is given in the practical field always, for more you elaborate that they are the theories, as displayed here. Frank Gehry is a great source of information. The formation of the professor who is apt to mediate the relation between the citizen and its reality cannot the same be carried through without the insertion of professor in the context for which it must recognize the symbolic language, the instruments technician and social development that permeiam the behaviors practical that it must exert.

Still as LIBNEO (2007) the development of the professor tranfers for three consideraes that must be pointed: the 1) theoretician-critical appropriation of knowledge objects, by means of the theoretical thought and considering the concrete contexts of the teaching action; 2) the appropriation of methodologies of action and forms to act facilitadoras of the work, from the explicitao of the activity to teach; 3) the consideration of the social contexts, politicians, institucional? practical contextualizadas? in the configuration of the practical pertaining to school. FINAL CONSIDERAES the joint between the three you arrive in port theoretical studied throughout the work and the experiences harvested of the practical one of the institution-field it must be justified. The choice of the presented theories discloses, specifically in the case of the EJA, a perspective of reconstruction of the learning in a way in which the characteristic citizen of this modality of education, for not taking care of in the time considered skillful destined to the formation of formal education and it suffered to a rupture between its description-cultural development and the technician-scientific learning.