However, without changing the political system of complete equilibrium in society does not happen, which should lead to reform and the system too. Thus, we can assume that all three types of economic relations are inherent in any society, interact and complement each other. Relation to the national economy of various types of economic relations (the traditional, administrative and market) determines the economic system of society, which is consistent with its political and social systems. With a certain degree of probability, we can say that in developing a stable, not prone to domestic political and military catastrophes, national economies, each type of economic relations corresponds to the size (small, medium, large) of economic entities. The traditional type of relations prevailing in a shallow and small business (sole proprietorship, a family business, etc.); administrative – in the medium and large (partnerships, companies, etc.); market relations can take place not only on intra-or intranet level, but are necessary for the binding medium relationships of all actors of the economy as a whole. At the same time each stage of development of the entity corresponds to the predominance of the most effective type of economic relations. In applying this statements are objective exceptions, ie, economic actors who can not be translated on the market, even with a significant increase in their capital intensity and scale. For example, this system national defense, law enforcement and other government institutions, as well as natural monopolies are in the national (state) ownership and management. State participation in the domestic economy increases the share of administrative economic relations, and its magnitude have a significant influence on the economic system of society.